Seven checks, two registers
A crypto casino licence: the number, the holder and the domain in the Curaçao and Anjouan registers
A licence number tells you something only if it has a counterpart in the record kept by the authority that issued it. We set out step by step how to find the number in the register, how to compare the holding company and the domain, and how to read the rights reserved in the terms.
On most sites a crypto casino licence appears as a small badge and a number in the footer. Whether that number really tells you anything is for the register of the issuing authority to say: is there a record, in whose name, for which domains, and is it still valid. This page passes judgment on no operator; it lets you read the number for yourself, in seven checks.
The table immediately below shows what Vave and the twelve operators in the ranking write about Türkiye on their own country lists. What those lists mean for an account is set out in the section “Türkiye on the operators' country lists”. All the examples come from the operators' own texts and from register searches run between the end of August and 13 September 2026; each example carries its own date.
| Casino | The operator’s country list | Clause | Date read |
|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | |
| 1 | — | — | — |
| 2 | Türkiye does not appear in the complete list | cl. 3.1 and 2.1.11 | 26 August 2026 |
| 3 | Türkiye does not appear in the complete list | cl. 2.4 | 26 August 2026 |
| 4 | Türkiye does not appear in the complete list | — | 26 August 2026 |
| 5 | Türkiye does not appear in the complete list | — | 26 August 2026 |
| 6 | Türkiye does not appear in the complete list | cl. 8.3 | 26 August 2026 |
| 7 | — | — | — |
| 8 | Türkiye does not appear in the complete list | cl. 3.2 | 2 September 2026 |
| 9 | — | — | — |
| 10 | Türkiye does not appear in the complete list | — | 26 August 2026 |
| 11 | Türkiye does not appear in the complete list | — | 26 August 2026 |
| 12 | — | — | — |
Seven checks on a crypto casino licence
The seven steps below shorten the road from a number to a decision. The first four look at the licence itself and the last three at the clauses in the terms that stand beside it:
- Where is the number written? In the footer, in a numbered clause, or in both?
- What does the register say? The Curaçao record sits at cert.cga.cw and the Anjouan record at anjouangaming.com; the fields to look at are the status and the dates.
- Is the holding company the same? Does the company name on the certificate match the contracting party in the terms?
- Is the domain on the certificate? Does the address you play at appear within the scope of the record?
- Does the identity clause give an amount and a deadline? Is the total at which documents are asked for written, and how many days are allowed?
- Are the caps and instalments written? Is the period cap, the instalment threshold and the currency stated?
- What does the operator reserve? Which rights do the sentences beginning “the operator reserves” leave open?
None of these checks gives you a conclusion on its own. Read together, they let you see in advance which rules an account is subject to. The ranking's fifth criterion is in fact the combination of the second and fourth checks: does the issuing authority's record show the operator's own domain?
| Casino | Score | Licence | Identity check | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3/5 | Curaçao · vavegame.com on the certificate | At the withdrawal requestcl. 8.7 | Go to the casino's page | |
| 1 | 4/5 | Curaçao · register: active | Tied to an eventcl. 3.13, 6.6 | Go to the siteThe file |
| 2 | 4/5 | Curaçao · portal: invalid | At the withdrawal requestcl. 11.4, 12.4 | Go to the siteThe file |
| 3 | 4/5 | Anjouan · valid until 29 September 2026 | Tied to an eventcl. 2.7, 11.2 | Go to the siteThe file |
| 6 | 3/5 | Curaçao · register: active | Tied to an eventcl. 5.2 | Go to the siteThe file |
| 7 | 2/5 | Curaçao · register: active | Tied to an eventcl. 8.22, 4.3 | Go to the siteThe file |
| 8 | 2/5 | Curaçao · register: active | The moment is not writtencl. 21.1 | Go to the siteThe file |
Every Go to the site button in this table opens the same address: the casino that pays for promotion on this site, not the business named in the row beside it. The file , on the other hand, goes to that business's own record; the clauses behind the scores are quoted there. The scores are counted from published terms and register entries, and that count is not for sale.
The first check: the number in the footer and in the terms
Where the number sits also sets its weight. A number written in a numbered clause of the terms is a statement the operator has put into the contract; a badge standing only in the footer is a weaker signal.
Wolfbet is consistent on this front: the Anjouan number ALSI-132405048-FI3 is written the same way both in cl. 1 §1 of the terms and in the footer (2 September 2026). At Thunderpick it is the other way round. The Curaçao register lists OGL/2024/677/0722 as an active certificate, but Thunderpick's own terms carry neither the authority's name nor a number; the record is reached not from the site but directly from the register. At Rainbet the seal in the footer carries no number; the only authority named in cl. 21.6 is Gaming Services Provider N.V. and there is no number to search the register with.
Two further examples concern not the number itself but its name. Bitsler's terms still speak of OGL/2024/930/0387 as an application in cl. 1.1; even so, in the register search of 12 September 2026 bitsler.com appeared in that number's record. At Shuffle.com the number and the register match exactly (8 September 2026); only the authority's name is written differently in the two texts: the licence page says Curaçao Gaming Control Board and the terms Curaçao Gaming Authority. Differences of that kind do not amount to a problem on their own, but they are worth noting.
The second check: the search in the register
On the Curaçao side the search is made through cert.cga.cw. It works by domain or by company name; if all you have is a number the result can come back empty, and that does not on its own show there is no licence. On the Anjouan side the public record at anjouangaming.com is read by numbers beginning with ALSI. In both registers the three fields you need are the same: the status, the date of issue and the expiry date where there is one.
Of the three, the status field gives the clearest answer. In Rocketpot's case the terms (cl. 1.2) give 1668/JAZ together with Danneskjold Ventures B.V.; the portal, meanwhile, listed that same certificate as “invalid” on both 12 and 13 September 2026. A number being written in the terms does not mean it is valid in the register.
The date fields matter just as much. Wild Fortune's Anjouan record (ALSI-202509073-FI2, held by Metlait SRL) is dated 30 September 2025; it writes 29 September 2026 as the end and appeared valid in the search of 12 September 2026. After such a date you cannot know whether the record was renewed without searching it again. Vave's certificate OGL/2024/1676/0905, for its part, has been active in the name of Latcas B.V. since 19 May 2025.
In Anjouan records more than one domain can be listed under a single number. Metlait SRL's record counts twenty-nine domains under one number, and wildfortune.io is one row of that list (2 September 2026). On a list like that, check whether the domain you are looking for appears by name; another site belonging to the same company being in the record does not show that the address you play at is covered.
The third and fourth checks: the holding company and the domain
Finding a record in the register is half the job. The other half is whether the record covers the company you are dealing with and the address you play at. The diagram just above shows that a single domain search in fact answers two separate questions: is the domain within the scope of a certificate, and does the number the site shows belong to that certificate?
The holding company. At Wild.io two company names stand face to face: Curaçao's certificate OGL/2024/210/0198 is registered to Nonce Gaming B.V. and was active on 31 August 2026, while the operator's own text identifies the counterparty to the contract as Stack Gaming Ltd. At Metaspins the difference is at the level of the authority: cl. 1.1 of the terms ties the licence to Anjouan and gives the number ALSI-202606048-FI2, while in Curaçao's record, as of 12 September 2026, an active certificate stood in the name of Metaspins N.V. (OGL/2024/1063/0437, metaspins.com). Neither document says which of them covers your account. In such a case it is worth asking the support team in writing who the contracting party is and keeping the answer with its date.
The domain. Vave's certificate showed only the domain vavegame.com on cert.cga.cw on 12 September 2026; vave.com was not in that record. At Jack.com the new domain has a certificate of its own: number OGL/2024/1562/1139 is registered to Data Link Digital B.V., dated 23 July 2025, with jack.com within its scope; the old jackbit.com hangs on a different certificate. At Bitcasino.io the record OGL/2023/111/0069 is in the name of Moon Technologies B.V. and appeared together with the domain bitcasino.io in the search of 12 September 2026. Compare the domain in your browser's address bar with the list on the certificate letter for letter.
The fifth, sixth and seventh checks: the identity clause, the caps, the reserved rights
A register record does not tell you under which rules the money will come back; those rules are in the terms. So the last three checks look directly at the clauses.
The identity clause. Only two operators write as a figure the amount from which documents are asked for. Bitcasino.io gives €2,500 or its equivalent in crypto (cl. 6.6); at Rocketpot two figures stand side by side, $2,500 in cl. 11.4 and $2,000 in cl. 12.4. Document deadlines are written by more operators. Rainbet cl. 20.1 gives 72 hours for documents. The other deadlines run as follows: 14 days for Vave (cl. 8.7), two weeks for Wild Fortune (cl. 8.4 and 9.3), thirty calendar days for Rocketpot (cl. 12.2) and thirty days for Metaspins (cl. 9.10). The full comparison of the amounts and the deadlines is on the page describing the document thresholds.
The caps and instalments. Wolfbet's cl. 15 §5 sets a ceiling of $8,000 a week and $30,000 per calendar month; Wild Fortune's cl. 11.8 writes €1,000, €5,000 and €15,000 for the day, the week and the month respectively. On the instalment side, Rocketpot cl. 11.5 divides winnings of $5,000 and above into monthly parts, Metaspins cl. 12.5 may apply an instalment depending on the payment method, and Vave cl. 8.8 provides for exceptional equal instalments on winnings of 50,000 USDT and above. The details are on the withdrawal caps page.
The reserved rights. In the terms, sentences beginning “the operator reserves” define the space around the written rules. Bitcasino.io cl. 6.6 keeps withdrawals below €2,500 open to review as well. Bitsler cl. 8.6 sets the floor and the ceiling of a withdrawal itself, and cl. 4.4 lets it suspend the account until documents arrive. Wolfbet cl. 5 §2 lets it hold the balance without telling you where there is suspicion. Metaspins cl. 9.10 writes that any remaining balance may be seized if the deadline passes, and Rainbet cl. 20.1 writes a similar outcome. Reading those sentences lets you see in advance why and at what point a check may come.
Türkiye on the operators' country lists
Most sets of terms carry a clause listing the countries where the service is not offered. The table at the head of this page summarises those lists as regards Türkiye. The phrase “Türkiye does not appear in the complete list” means this: the whole list was opened on the operator's own page and the name Türkiye is not in it. The lists were read between 26 August and 2 September 2026; the clause number and the source are written separately on each row. On rows showing «—» the table reports no statement.
What such a clause means for an account is written in the operator's own sentence. The general framework is this: opening an account or playing from a place named on the list counts as a breach of the terms, and the clauses mostly tie that to the account being closed and the winnings being voided. Wild Fortune cl. 2.4, for example, writes that those playing from the places listed have no right to a refund or a withdrawal (2 September 2026).
A name not being on a list does not tell you everything either. Thunderpick cl. 3.2 counts two open groups alongside the country names: states subject to UN sanctions and countries on the FATF blacklist (2 September 2026). Shuffle.com cl. 8.3 adds a general wording for places it does not name one by one (26 August 2026). Lists can change over time, and what applies is always the current text the operator publishes. So read the relevant clause yourself before you open an account, and note the clause number and the date you read it.
What a crypto casino licence does not show
A register record shows three things: the holder of the record, its status and, in some registers, the domains covered. It does not show when or in what parts the money will be paid, the document threshold, or which rules will apply in a dispute; those are the business of the terms.
Nor does it show the mathematics of the game. The method by which you can see, by calculation, that a single hand was not altered afterwards is a separate subject, set out with its limits on the provable fairness page. The score and the file of each of the twelve operators in the ranking are gathered in one place by the list holding the operator files.
None of the operators on the list shows a licence issued in Türkiye; every licence read comes from an authority in Curaçao or Anjouan. Which text in Türkiye addresses which authority and which party stands under separate headings on the legislation page. If you want support to take a break from play or to set yourself a budget, YEDAM (the Yeşilay Counselling Centre) gives advice on its line, 115; the address is yedam.org.tr.
How to keep a search result
A register search describes only the day it was made. Records are renewed, suspended, or have new domains added to them; so the date matters as much as the search itself. A practical arrangement can be set up like this:
- Take a screenshot of the search screen, with the address bar and the date visible.
- Write the four fields of the record in a separate note: the number, the holding company, the status and the list of domains.
- Add the licence sentence from the terms to the same note, with its clause number.
- If the record has an expiry date, set yourself a reminder for the first week after that day.
A note like that shows, in a later dispute, what you saw on which day. It helps in correspondence with support too: you can put the question concretely — “your certificate does not show this domain” — rather than as a general complaint. Keep the search notes apart from where you keep your identity documents and wallet details; the warnings about recovery words and checking addresses are on the choosing a wallet page.